Toyota Land Cruiser 1999 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 1997
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.4 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 178 HP | 194 HP | |
Torque: | 303 NM | 313 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 16 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Despite less power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.5 | 13.7 | |
Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Toyota Land Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 92 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
810 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.73 m | 4.72 m | |
Width: | 1.73 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.86 m | 1.90 m | |
Toyota Land Cruiser is 1 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 3`300 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 6800 | 2400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |