Toyota Land Cruiser 2004 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 4.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 430 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser 2004 is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Land Cruiser 2004 engine produces 45 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser 1998, but torque is 50 NM less than Toyota Land Cruiser 1998. Thanks to more power Toyota Land Cruiser 2004 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.5 | 12.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 13.2 l/100km | 14.1 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser 2004 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Toyota Land Cruiser 2004 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser 1998, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser 2004 could require 135 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Toyota Land Cruiser 2004 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser 1998. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 96 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser 1998 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 23 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Toyota 4-Runner | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Land Cruiser 2004 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.90 m | 1.88 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser 2004 is smaller, but slightly higher. Toyota Land Cruiser 2004 is 4 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser 1998, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser 2004 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser 2004 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser 1998, which means Toyota Land Cruiser 2004 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |