Toyota Land Cruiser 2004 vs Lexus RX 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 283 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 9 seconds | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 45 HP more power than Lexus RX, whereas torque is 97 NM more than Lexus RX. Despite the higher power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.5 | 12.2 | |
|
The Lexus RX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Lexus RX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 72 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.90 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is larger. Toyota Land Cruiser is 11 cm longer than the Lexus RX, 4 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 22 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 439 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2130 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 2`380 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8800 | 6600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.4/10 | 9.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Lexus RX has
| |