Toyota Land Cruiser 2003 vs Volvo XC90 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 4.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 HP | 315 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC90 is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 66 HP less power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Volvo XC90. Due to the lower power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.6 | 13.5 | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 22 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Toyota 4-Runner | Used also on Volvo S80 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Land Cruiser might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.90 m | 1.78 m | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser is 4 cm longer than the Volvo XC90, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 613 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1837 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 1.1 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 2`770 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 9000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.4/10 | 8.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |