Toyota Land Cruiser 2003 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 HP | 198 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 312 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 51 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 68 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.6 | 13.1 | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 690 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.90 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is larger. Toyota Land Cruiser is 24 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 4 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2047 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.3 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 2`427 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 3400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.4/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |