Toyota Land Cruiser 2006 vs Nissan Pathfinder 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Double-row timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 173 HP | 174 HP | |
| Torque: | 410 NM | 403 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 1 HP less power than Nissan Pathfinder, but torque is 7 NM more than Nissan Pathfinder. Despite less power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 10.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.2 l/100km | 11.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pathfinder, which means that by driving the Toyota Land Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pathfinder. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 25 years | 27 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Toyota Hilux | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Navara, Nissan Murano | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Pathfinder might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota Land Cruiser 2006 3.0 engine: The engine tends to be noisy and vibrate.
Nozzle life is limited when using poor quality fuel.
Increased oil consumption tends to occur over time. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.90 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is larger. Toyota Land Cruiser is 11 cm longer than the Nissan Pathfinder, 3 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 620 litres | 515 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2091 litres | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has more luggage capacity. Toyota Land Cruiser has 105 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Pathfinder. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 1 metres less than that of the Nissan Pathfinder, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 2`880 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Nissan Pathfinder has
| |