Toyota Land Cruiser 2002 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 343 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 2 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Due to the lower power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 9.1 | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.90 m | 1.86 m | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser is 2 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 415 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1253 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 2`510 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |