Toyota Land Cruiser 2002 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.1 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 343 NM | 384 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 23 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, but torque is 41 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Thanks to more power Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 11.8 | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Toyota Land Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.90 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is larger. Toyota Land Cruiser is 24 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 4 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2047 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 2`375 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 3400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.4/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |