Toyota Land Cruiser 2002 vs Volvo XC90 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 243 HP | |
| Torque: | 343 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC90 is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 80 HP less power than Volvo XC90, but torque is 23 NM more than Volvo XC90. Due to the lower power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 11.5 | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that by driving the Toyota Land Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.90 m | 1.78 m | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser is 4 cm longer than the Volvo XC90, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 613 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1837 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 1.1 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 2`760 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 9200 | 9000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.4/10 | 8.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |