Toyota Land Cruiser 2002 vs Nissan Patrol 2004

 
Toyota Land Cruiser
2002 - 2007
Nissan Patrol
2004 - 2010
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.0 Diesel3.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 163 HP160 HP
Torque: 343 NM380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.8 seconds16.3 seconds
Toyota Land Cruiser is more dynamic to drive.
Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 3 HP more power than Nissan Patrol, but torque is 37 NM less than Nissan Patrol. Thanks to more power Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.410.8
Real fuel consumption: 10.5 l/100km11.5 l/100km
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Patrol, which means that by driving the Toyota Land Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Patrol.
Fuel tank capacity: 87 litres95 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 830 km in combined cycle870 km in combined cycle
1000 km on highway1050 km on highway
820 km with real consumption820 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.85 m5.15 m
Width: 1.88 m1.94 m
Height: 1.90 m1.86 m
Toyota Land Cruiser is smaller, but slightly higher.
Toyota Land Cruiser is 30 cm shorter than the Nissan Patrol, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data810 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data2226 litres
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters12.2 meters
The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.8 metres less than that of the Nissan Patrol, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`8003`110
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 940012 800
Pros and Cons: Toyota Land Cruiser has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv