Toyota Land Cruiser 2002 vs Mercedes ML 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 343 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Mercedes ML is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 27 HP less power than Mercedes ML, whereas torque is 97 NM less than Mercedes ML. Due to the lower power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 9.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.5 l/100km | 10.7 l/100km | |
|
By specification Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 150 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 95 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
| 820 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Mercedes ML gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.90 m | 1.82 m | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser is 7 cm longer than the Mercedes ML, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 551 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.6 metres less than that of the Mercedes ML, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 2`830 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 5400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.4/10 | 9.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Mercedes ML has
| |