Toyota Land Cruiser 2002 vs Lexus LX 1998
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 4.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 163 HP | 234 HP | |
Torque: | 343 NM | 434 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
Lexus LX is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 71 HP less power than Lexus LX, whereas torque is 91 NM less than Lexus LX. Due to the lower power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 16.0 | |
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 5.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Lexus LX, which means that by driving the Toyota Land Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 840 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 96 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
1000 km on highway | 690 km on highway | ||
Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.85 m | 4.89 m | |
Width: | 1.88 m | 1.94 m | |
Height: | 1.90 m | 1.85 m | |
Toyota Land Cruiser is smaller, but higher. Toyota Land Cruiser is 4 cm shorter than the Lexus LX, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 5 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 541 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2510 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.7 metres less than that of the Lexus LX, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 3`112 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 8400 | 13 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Lexus LX has
| |