Toyota Land Cruiser 2002 vs Land Rover Range Rover 1995
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 163 HP | 136 HP | |
Torque: | 343 NM | 270 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 17.5 seconds | |
Toyota Land Cruiser is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 27 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 73 NM more than Land Rover Range Rover. Thanks to more power Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 4.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 11.4 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 10.5 l/100km | 11.9 l/100km | |
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that by driving the Toyota Land Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 90 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
1000 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
820 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.85 m | 4.71 m | |
Width: | 1.88 m | 1.89 m | |
Height: | 1.90 m | 1.82 m | |
Toyota Land Cruiser is 14 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 8 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.5 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 3`500 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 8400 | 4000 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 9.4/10 | 8.4/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |