Toyota Land Cruiser 2002 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 272 HP | |
| Torque: | 343 NM | 640 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 109 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 297 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 100 litres | |
| 820 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.96 m | |
| Height: | 1.90 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is smaller, but higher. Toyota Land Cruiser is 10 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 535 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.2 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8800 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |