Toyota Land Cruiser 2002 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005

 
Toyota Land Cruiser
2002 - 2007
Land Rover Range Rover Sport
2005 - 2009
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.0 Diesel2.7 Diesel

Performance

Power: 163 HP190 HP
Torque: 343 NM440 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.8 seconds12.7 seconds
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a more dynamic driving.
Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 27 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, whereas torque is 97 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Due to the lower power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.410.2
Real fuel consumption: 10.5 l/100km11.0 l/100km
By specification Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 30 litres more fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport.
Fuel tank capacity: 87 litres82 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 830 km in combined cycle800 km in combined cycle
820 km with real consumption740 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.85 m4.79 m
Width: 1.88 m1.93 m
Height: 1.90 m1.78 m
Toyota Land Cruiser is 6 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 12 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters11.6 meters
The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.2 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport.
Gross weight (kg): 2`800no data
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 92006400
Pros and Cons:
    Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
    • more power
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv