Toyota Land Cruiser 2002 vs Dodge Durango 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 5.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 236 HP | |
| Torque: | 343 NM | 407 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 20.2 seconds | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 73 HP less power than Dodge Durango, whereas torque is 64 NM less than Dodge Durango. Despite less power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 7.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 16.8 | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 6.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Durango, which means that by driving the Toyota Land Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 960 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 95 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 640 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.91 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.90 m | 1.84 m | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser is 6 cm shorter than the Dodge Durango, 6 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 532 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2482 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 2`903 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Dodge Durango has
| |