Toyota Land Cruiser 2015 vs Nissan X-Trail 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Nissan X-Trail can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Nissan X-Trail also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 4.0 - 5.7 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 - 381 HP | 136 - 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 - 650 NM | 192 - 314 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 9.9 - 13.1 seconds | |
| In general, Toyota Land Cruiser are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Nissan X-Trail. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 - 16.8 | 7.1 - 10.0 | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser petrol engines consumes on average 5.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan X-Trail. On average, Toyota Land Cruiser equipped with diesel engines consume 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.98 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.92 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is larger. Toyota Land Cruiser is 44 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 22 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 22 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2345 litres | 1841 litres | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has more luggage capacity. Toyota Land Cruiser has 46 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Land Cruiser (by 504 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 1.2 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 3`322 kg | ~ 2`009 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 2`538 kg | ~ 1`466 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 784 kg | ~ 543 kg | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 31 procentiem more than Nissan X-Trail. Therefore, Toyota Land Cruiser is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 54 600 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |