Toyota Land Cruiser 1985 vs Land Rover Defender 1991
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 4.0 (diesel) | 2.5 - 3.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 - 136 HP | 86 - 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 241 - 315 NM | 203 - 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.5 seconds | 14.7 - 24 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 - 12.9 | 10.1 - 18.1 | |
|
On average, Toyota Land Cruiser equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Defender. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 2.05 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is larger, but lower. Toyota Land Cruiser is 15 cm longer than the Land Rover Defender, 9 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 21 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.4 meters | 12.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.6 metres more than that of the Land Rover Defender, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`500 | ~ 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Land Rover Defender has
| |