Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 vs Volvo XC90 2019
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Toyota Land Cruiser is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Volvo XC90 is available only with automatic gearbox. | |||
| Engines: | 2.7 - 4.0 (petrol, diesel) | 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. Volvo XC90 is available also with hybrid engines. Hybrid engines offer superior fuel efficiency and reduced emissions compared to conventional engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 249 HP | 235 - 407 HP | |
| Torque: | 246 - 450 NM | 350 - 640 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 - 12.7 seconds | 5.4 - 7.9 seconds | |
| In general, Volvo XC90 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Toyota Land Cruiser. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 - 11.7 | 1.5 - 10.8 | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser petrol engines consumes on average 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC90. On average, Toyota Land Cruiser equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | 223 mm (8.8 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is smaller, but higher. Toyota Land Cruiser is 11 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 621 litres | 368 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1934 litres | 1886 litres | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Volvo XC90 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Land Cruiser (by 48 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.9 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`916 kg | ~ 2`858 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 2`130 kg | ~ 2`238 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 786 kg | ~ 620 kg | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 21 procentiem more than Volvo XC90. Therefore, Toyota Land Cruiser is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 44 800 | 43 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |