Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 vs Toyota Hilux 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Toyota Hilux can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Toyota Hilux also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.7 - 4.0 (petrol, diesel) | 2.4 - 2.8 (diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with diesel engines. Toyota Land Cruiser is available also with petrol engines. Petrol engines typically offer smoother operation and quicker acceleration compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 249 HP | 150 - 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 246 - 450 NM | 400 - 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 - 12.7 seconds | 12.8 - 13.2 seconds | |
| In general, Toyota Land Cruiser are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Toyota Hilux. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 - 11.7 | 7.0 - 8.0 | |
|
On average, Toyota Land Cruiser equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Hilux. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | 293 mm (11.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Toyota Hilux can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 5.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.82 m | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser is 49 cm shorter than the Toyota Hilux, width is practically the same , while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 621 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1934 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 13.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 1.8 metres less than that of the Toyota Hilux, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`916 kg | ~ 3`095 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 2`130 kg | ~ 2`050 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 786 kg | ~ 1`045 kg | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 33 procentiem less than Toyota Hilux. Therefore, Toyota Hilux is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 44 200 | 20 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Toyota Hilux has
| |