Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 vs Toyota 4-Runner 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Toyota Land Cruiser is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Toyota 4-Runner is available only with automatic gearbox. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Toyota 4-Runner can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Toyota 4-Runner also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.7 - 4.0 (petrol, diesel) | 4.0 - 4.7 (petrol) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Toyota Land Cruiser is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 249 HP | 235 - 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 246 - 450 NM | 382 - 434 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 - 12.7 seconds | 7.8 - 8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 - 11.7 | 12.2 - 14.1 | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser petrol engines consumes on average 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota 4-Runner. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.76 m | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser is 4 cm longer than the Toyota 4-Runner, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 621 litres | 1195 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2050 litres | |
|
Toyota 4-Runner has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Toyota Land Cruiser has 574 litres less trunk space than the Toyota 4-Runner. This could mean that the Toyota Land Cruiser uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.5 metres more than that of the Toyota 4-Runner, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`916 | ~ 2`411 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 50 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Toyota 4-Runner has
| |