Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 vs Jeep Wrangler 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.7 - 4.0 (petrol, diesel) | 2.0 - 6.4 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. Jeep Wrangler is available also with hybrid engines. Hybrid engines offer superior fuel efficiency and reduced emissions compared to conventional engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 249 HP | 200 - 470 HP | |
| Torque: | 246 - 450 NM | 353 - 637 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 - 12.7 seconds | 6.4 - 10.3 seconds | |
| In general, Jeep Wrangler are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Toyota Land Cruiser. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 - 11.7 | 4.1 - 16.8 | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jeep Wrangler. On average, Toyota Land Cruiser equipped with diesel engines consume 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Wrangler. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | 242 - 274 mm (9.5 - 10.8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Wrangler can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.87 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota Land Cruiser is 3 cm longer than the Jeep Wrangler, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 621 litres | 784 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1934 litres | 1909 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Toyota Land Cruiser uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Land Cruiser (by 25 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.8 metres less than that of the Jeep Wrangler, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`916 kg | ~ 2`668 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 2`130 kg | ~ 2`145 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 786 kg | ~ 523 kg | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 33 procentiem more than Jeep Wrangler. Therefore, Toyota Land Cruiser is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 43 200 | 42 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Jeep Wrangler has
| |