Toyota Land Cruiser 2009 vs Mercedes ML 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.7 - 4.0 | 3.0 - 6.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 282 HP | 190 - 510 HP | |
| Torque: | 246 - 410 NM | 350 - 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 - 11.7 seconds | 5 - 9.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 - 10.8 | 8.4 - 16.5 | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser petrol engines consumes on average 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes ML. On average, Toyota Land Cruiser equipped with diesel engines consume 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.88 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is smaller, but higher. Toyota Land Cruiser is 2 cm shorter than the Mercedes ML, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 104 litres | 551 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1930 litres | no data | |
|
Mercedes ML has more luggage space. Toyota Land Cruiser has 447 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes ML. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mercedes ML, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`945 | ~ 2`854 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 18 200 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Mercedes ML has
| |