Toyota Land Cruiser 2002 vs Nissan Terrano 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 4.2 - 4.7 (petrol, diesel) | 2.7 - 3.0 (diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 - 238 HP | 125 - 154 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 - 434 NM | 278 - 343 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 - 13.6 seconds | 13.5 - 16.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 - 16.4 | 9.1 - 9.9 | |
|
On average, Toyota Land Cruiser equipped with diesel engines consume 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Terrano. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.81 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is larger. Toyota Land Cruiser is 16 cm longer than the Nissan Terrano, 18 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 115 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1900 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.4 metres more than that of the Nissan Terrano, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`500 | ~ 2`933 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Nissan Terrano has
| |