Toyota Land Cruiser 1990 vs Jeep Cherokee 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Jeep Cherokee can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Jeep Cherokee also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.8 - 4.5 | 2.5 - 4.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 91 - 215 HP | 116 - 192 HP | |
| Torque: | 188 - 380 NM | 198 - 305 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 - 16 seconds | 10.1 - 13 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 - 17.8 | 9.5 - 14.0 | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser petrol engines consumes on average 3.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Jeep Cherokee. On average, Toyota Land Cruiser equipped with diesel engines consume 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.91 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is larger. Toyota Land Cruiser is 59 cm longer than the Jeep Cherokee, 11 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 29 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 832 litres | 1011 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1370 litres | 2033 litres | |
|
Jeep Cherokee has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Toyota Land Cruiser has 179 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Cherokee. This could mean that the Toyota Land Cruiser uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Cherokee (by 663 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 1.1 metres more than that of the Jeep Cherokee, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`993 | ~ 2`169 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 12 000 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |