Toyota Land Cruiser 1990 vs Nissan Patrol 1997

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Toyota Land Cruiser
1990 - 1998
Nissan Patrol
1997 - 2005
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 2.8 - 4.52.8 - 4.8

Performance

Power: 91 - 215 HP129 - 245 HP
Torque: 188 - 380 NM252 - 400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.4 - 16 seconds10.8 - 18.4 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 11.2 - 17.810.8 - 18.2
Toyota Land Cruiser petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Nissan Patrol. On average, Toyota Land Cruiser equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Patrol.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.84 m4.99 m
Width: 1.89 m1.89 m
Height: 1.91 m1.86 m
Toyota Land Cruiser is smaller, but higher.
Toyota Land Cruiser is 15 cm shorter than the Nissan Patrol, width is practically the same , while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 5 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 832 litres810 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1370 litres2287 litres
Even though the car is shorter, The Nissan Patrol may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Patrol (by 917 litres).
Turning diameter: 12 meters12.2 meters
The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.2 metres less than that of the Nissan Patrol.
Gross weight: ~ 2`993 kg~ 2`881 kg
Net weight:~ 2`255 kg~ 2`314 kg
Load capacity:~ 738 kg~ 567 kg
Toyota Land Cruiser load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 23 procentiem more than Nissan Patrol. Therefore, Toyota Land Cruiser is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 12 4009600
Pros and Cons: Toyota Land Cruiser has
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
Nissan Patrol has
  • lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
  • more spacious trunk with the seats down
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv