Toyota Land Cruiser 1998 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.0 - 4.7 | 3.2 - 3.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 - 235 HP | 165 - 202 HP | |
| Torque: | 295 - 434 NM | 318 - 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 - 14.9 seconds | 10.6 - 13.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 - 16.6 | 9.5 - 14.2 | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Pajero. On average, Toyota Land Cruiser equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.86 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is smaller, but slightly higher. Toyota Land Cruiser is 2 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 8 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`033 | ~ 3`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |