Toyota Land Cruiser 1998 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 1990
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 3.0 - 4.7 | 2.8 - 4.5 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 125 - 235 HP | 91 - 215 HP | |
Torque: | 295 - 434 NM | 188 - 380 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 - 14.9 seconds | 11.4 - 16 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 - 16.6 | 11.2 - 17.8 | |
Toyota Land Cruiser 1998 petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Land Cruiser 1990. On average, Toyota Land Cruiser 1998 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser 1990. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.78 m | 4.84 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.89 m | |
Height: | 1.87 m | 1.91 m | |
Toyota Land Cruiser 1998 is smaller. Toyota Land Cruiser 1998 is 6 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser 1990, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser 1998 is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 832 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1370 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12 meters | |
The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser 1998 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser 1990. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`033 | ~ 2`993 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 7000 | 12 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
| |