Toyota Land Cruiser 1998 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.0 - 4.7 | 3.0 - 4.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 - 235 HP | 163 - 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 295 - 434 NM | 343 - 410 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 - 14.9 seconds | 9.5 - 12.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 - 16.6 | 9.0 - 13.6 | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser 1998 petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Land Cruiser 2002. On average, Toyota Land Cruiser 1998 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser 2002. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.90 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser 1998 is smaller. Toyota Land Cruiser 1998 is 7 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser 2002, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser 1998 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 620 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser 1998 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser 2002, which means Toyota Land Cruiser 1998 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`033 | ~ 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |