Toyota Land Cruiser 1998 vs Nissan Terrano 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.0 - 4.7 | 2.4 - 2.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 - 235 HP | 118 - 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 295 - 434 NM | 191 - 278 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 - 14.9 seconds | 14.3 - 17.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 - 16.6 | 9.9 - 12.3 | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser petrol engines consumes on average 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan Terrano. On average, Toyota Land Cruiser equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Terrano. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.85 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is larger. Toyota Land Cruiser is 8 cm longer than the Nissan Terrano, 4 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 115 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1900 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.4 metres more than that of the Nissan Terrano, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`033 | ~ 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Nissan Terrano has
| |