Toyota Land Cruiser 1998 vs Nissan Patrol 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.0 - 4.7 | 2.8 - 4.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 - 235 HP | 129 - 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 295 - 434 NM | 252 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 - 14.9 seconds | 10.8 - 18.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 - 16.6 | 10.8 - 18.2 | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser petrol engines consumes on average 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Nissan Patrol. On average, Toyota Land Cruiser equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Patrol. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.99 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.86 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is smaller, but slightly higher. Toyota Land Cruiser is 21 cm shorter than the Nissan Patrol, 9 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 810 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2287 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.4 metres less than that of the Nissan Patrol. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`033 | ~ 2`881 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
| |