Toyota Land Cruiser 1998 vs Nissan Pathfinder 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.0 - 4.7 | 2.5 - 4.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 - 235 HP | 174 - 269 HP | |
| Torque: | 295 - 434 NM | 385 - 403 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 - 14.9 seconds | 8.9 - 12.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 - 16.6 | 9.0 - 13.5 | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan Pathfinder. On average, Toyota Land Cruiser equipped with diesel engines consume 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pathfinder. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.78 m | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser is 4 cm longer than the Nissan Pathfinder, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 515 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2091 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.6 metres less than that of the Nissan Pathfinder, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`033 | ~ 2`822 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Nissan Pathfinder has
| |