Toyota Land Cruiser 2002 vs Volvo XC90 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volvo XC90 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Volvo XC90 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 3.0 - 4.0 | 2.4 - 4.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 249 HP | 163 - 315 HP | |
| Torque: | 343 - 410 NM | 320 - 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 - 12.8 seconds | 7.3 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 - 13.6 | 8.2 - 13.5 | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser petrol engines consumes on average 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC90. On average, Toyota Land Cruiser equipped with diesel engines consume 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.90 m | 1.77 m | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser is 4 cm longer than the Volvo XC90, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 620 litres | 249 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1837 litres | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has more luggage capacity. Toyota Land Cruiser has 371 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC90. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 1.1 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`800 | ~ 2`735 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 8400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.4/10 | 8.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |