Toyota Land Cruiser 2002 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.0 - 4.0 | 3.0 - 4.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 249 HP | 125 - 235 HP | |
| Torque: | 343 - 410 NM | 295 - 434 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 - 12.8 seconds | 10.7 - 14.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 - 13.6 | 9.5 - 16.6 | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser 2002 petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Land Cruiser 1998. On average, Toyota Land Cruiser 2002 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser 1998. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.90 m | 1.87 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser 2002 is larger. Toyota Land Cruiser 2002 is 7 cm longer than the Toyota Land Cruiser 1998, 8 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser 2002 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 620 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser 2002 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser 1998, which means Toyota Land Cruiser 2002 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`800 | ~ 3`033 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |