Toyota Land Cruiser 2007 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 4.0 - 5.7 | 3.0 - 3.8 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 235 - 381 HP | 165 - 250 HP | |
Torque: | 376 - 615 NM | 261 - 441 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 - 9.2 seconds | 10.2 - 14 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 - 15.6 | 8.7 - 13.5 | |
Toyota Land Cruiser petrol engines consumes on average 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Pajero. On average, Toyota Land Cruiser equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.95 m | 4.90 m | |
Width: | 1.97 m | 1.88 m | |
Height: | 1.95 m | 1.87 m | |
Toyota Land Cruiser is larger. Toyota Land Cruiser is 5 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 9 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 8 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 701 litres | 215 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1790 litres | |
Toyota Land Cruiser has more luggage capacity. Toyota Land Cruiser has 486 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`300 | ~ 3`024 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | 20 800 | 11 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |