Toyota Land Cruiser 2012 vs Volvo XC90 2014
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volvo XC90 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Volvo XC90 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 4.5 - 5.7 (petrol, diesel) | 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 272 - 381 HP | 190 - 320 HP | |
| Torque: | 460 - 650 NM | 350 - 480 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 - 8.9 seconds | 5.6 - 9.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 - 15.0 | 2.1 - 8.1 | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser petrol engines consumes on average 6.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC90. On average, Toyota Land Cruiser equipped with diesel engines consume 3.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 226 mm (8.9 inches) | 238 mm (9.4 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC90 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.97 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.78 m | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser and Volvo XC90 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 615 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2313 litres | 1886 litres | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser has 159 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC90. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Land Cruiser (by 427 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.7 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`333 | ~ 2`880 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 31 400 | 26 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |