Toyota Land Cruiser 2012 vs Mercedes ML 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 4.5 - 5.7 | 2.1 - 4.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 272 - 381 HP | 204 - 408 HP | |
| Torque: | 460 - 650 NM | 370 - 620 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 - 8.9 seconds | 5.6 - 9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 - 15.0 | 6.2 - 11.5 | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser petrol engines consumes on average 4.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mercedes ML. On average, Toyota Land Cruiser equipped with diesel engines consume 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.97 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is larger. Toyota Land Cruiser is 15 cm longer than the Mercedes ML, 4 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 690 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2313 litres | 2010 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Toyota Land Cruiser uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Land Cruiser (by 303 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight: | ~ 3`333 kg | ~ 2`920 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 36 600 | 14 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mercedes ML has
| |