Toyota Hilux 2012 vs Nissan Navara 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 171 HP | 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 550 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Nissan Navara is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Hilux engine produces 60 HP less power than Nissan Navara, whereas torque is 190 NM less than Nissan Navara. Due to the lower power, Toyota Hilux reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 9.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.3 l/100km | 11.8 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Hilux is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Hilux consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara, which means that by driving the Toyota Hilux over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Hilux consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Hilux gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 25 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Toyota Land Cruiser | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Infiniti FX, Nissan Pathfinder | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Nissan Navara engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota Hilux 2012 3.0 engine: The engine tends to be noisy and vibrate.
Nozzle life is limited when using poor quality fuel.
Increased oil consumption tends to occur over time. Nissan Navara 2010 3.0 engine: The V9X engine stands out due to its unusual 65-degree V-angle. It features a lightweight cast-iron block, aluminum cylinder heads with hydraulic lifters, a variable geometry turbocharger, and a chain-driven timing ... More about Nissan Navara 2010 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.26 m | 5.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.79 m | |
|
Toyota Hilux is smaller, but higher. Toyota Hilux is 14 cm shorter than the Nissan Navara, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Hilux is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 900 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.2 meters | 13.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Hilux is 0.1 metres less than that of the Nissan Navara. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`730 | 3`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 000 | 15 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Hilux has
|
Nissan Navara has
| |