Toyota Hilux 2015 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 154 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Hilux engine produces 4 HP less power than Mitsubishi L 200, but torque is 20 NM more than Mitsubishi L 200. Due to the lower power, Toyota Hilux reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.5 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi L 200 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Toyota Hilux consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200, which means that by driving the Toyota Hilux over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Toyota Hilux consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1140 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| 840 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Hilux gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 293 mm (11.5 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Toyota Hilux can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi L 200 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 10 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Toyota Hilux engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.33 m | 5.21 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Toyota Hilux is larger. Toyota Hilux is 13 cm longer than the Mitsubishi L 200, 7 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Hilux is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Hilux is 1.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi L 200, which means Toyota Hilux can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`210 | 2`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 22 000 | 14 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Hilux has
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |