Toyota Hilux 2017 vs Ford Ranger 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 385 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
| Toyota Hilux engine produces 10 HP less power than Ford Ranger, but torque is 15 NM more than Ford Ranger. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.4 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Ranger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Hilux consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Hilux could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Hilux consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 890 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Ranger gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.33 m | 5.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.80 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota Hilux is 3 cm shorter than the Ford Ranger, width is practically the same , while the height of Toyota Hilux is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`000 | 3`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 30 800 | 35 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Hilux has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |