Toyota Hilux 2017 vs Ford Ranger 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 385 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
| Toyota Hilux engine produces 10 HP less power than Ford Ranger, but torque is 15 NM more than Ford Ranger. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 8.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.4 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Ranger is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Toyota Hilux consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that by driving the Toyota Hilux over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Toyota Hilux consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.33 m | 5.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.80 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota Hilux is 3 cm shorter than the Ford Ranger, width is practically the same , while the height of Toyota Hilux is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`000 kg | 3`200 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`915 kg | 1`749 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 1`085 kg | 1`451 kg | |
| Toyota Hilux load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 34 procentiem less than Ford Ranger. Therefore, Ford Ranger is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 24 400 | 29 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Hilux has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |