Toyota Hilux 2017 vs Ford Ranger 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 470 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
| Toyota Hilux engine produces 50 HP less power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Ford Ranger. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 8.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.4 l/100km | 11.0 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Hilux is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Hilux consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that by driving the Toyota Hilux over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Hilux consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Hilux gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.33 m | 5.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota Hilux is 3 cm shorter than the Ford Ranger, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`000 | 3`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 25 600 | 25 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Hilux has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |