Toyota Hilux 2017 vs Ford Ranger 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 385 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
| Toyota Hilux engine produces 10 HP less power than Ford Ranger, but torque is 15 NM more than Ford Ranger. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 8.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.4 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Ranger is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Toyota Hilux consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that by driving the Toyota Hilux over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Toyota Hilux consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.33 m | 5.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota Hilux is 3 cm shorter than the Ford Ranger, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`000 | 3`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 30 800 | 31 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Ford Ranger has
| |