Toyota Hilux 2017 vs Audi Q7 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 272 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.3 seconds | |
| Toyota Hilux engine produces 122 HP less power than Audi Q7, whereas torque is 200 NM less than Audi Q7. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 6.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.4 l/100km | 9.5 l/100km | |
|
The Audi Q7 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Hilux consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q7, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Hilux could require 255 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Hilux consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q7. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 85 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 1390 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 1570 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 890 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi Q7 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 470'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi Q7 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 3 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Audi A4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.33 m | 5.01 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.97 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.74 m | |
| Toyota Hilux is 33 cm longer than the Audi Q7, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Hilux is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 770 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 770 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1955 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.4 meters | |
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`000 | 2`940 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 30 200 | 39 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Hilux has
|
Audi Q7 has
| |