Toyota Hilux 2012 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.5 - 3.0 | 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 144 - 171 HP | 136 - 178 HP | |
| Torque: | 343 - 360 NM | 314 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 - 13.3 seconds | 12.1 - 17.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 - 8.6 | 7.7 - 8.7 | |
|
On average, Toyota Hilux equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.26 m | 5.16 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Toyota Hilux is larger. Toyota Hilux is 10 cm longer than the Mitsubishi L 200, 4 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Hilux is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 900 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.2 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Hilux is 1.4 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi L 200, which means Toyota Hilux can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`717 | ~ 2`875 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 000 | 10 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Hilux has
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |