Toyota Hilux 2017 vs Ford Ranger 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.4 - 2.8 (petrol, diesel) | 2.2 - 3.2 (diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 177 HP | 130 - 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 245 - 450 NM | 330 - 470 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.6 - 14.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 - 7.8 | 6.9 - 8.9 | |
|
On average, Toyota Hilux equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.33 m | 5.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.77 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Toyota Hilux is smaller. Toyota Hilux is 3 cm shorter than the Ford Ranger, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Hilux is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`934 | ~ 3`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 29 400 | 31 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Hilux has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |