Toyota Highlander 2019 vs Nissan X-Trail 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Toyota Highlander) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Nissan X-Trail) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 265 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10 seconds | |
| Toyota Highlander engine produces 88 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 | 6.1 | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Highlander consumes 3.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Highlander could require 555 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 203 mm (8 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Nissan X-Trail 2017 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.97 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Toyota Highlander is larger. Toyota Highlander is 28 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 11 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Highlander is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 453 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2387 litres | 1877 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Toyota Highlander uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Highlander (by 510 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Highlander is 0.2 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`708 kg | 2`400 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`965 kg | 1`730 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 743 kg | 670 kg | |
| Toyota Highlander load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 10 procentiem more than Nissan X-Trail. Therefore, Toyota Highlander is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 44 400 | 24 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Highlander has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |