Toyota Highlander 2019 vs Volvo XC90 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 265 HP | 210 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Toyota Highlander engine produces 55 HP more power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Volvo XC90. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 12.0 | |
|
The Toyota Highlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Highlander consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that by driving the Toyota Highlander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 390 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Highlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.97 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Toyota Highlander is larger. Toyota Highlander is 17 cm longer than the Volvo XC90, 3 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Highlander is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 453 litres | 249 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2387 litres | 2404 litres | |
| Toyota Highlander has 204 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC90. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC90 (by 17 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Highlander is 1.3 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Toyota Highlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`663 kg | 2`720 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`885 kg | 1`985 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 778 kg | 735 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 44 400 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Highlander has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |