Toyota Highlander 2019 vs Nissan X-Trail 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Toyota Highlander) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Nissan X-Trail) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 186 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 237 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
| Toyota Highlander engine produces 9 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, but torque is 143 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 5.6 | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Highlander consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Highlander could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 203 mm (8 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2017 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.97 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Toyota Highlander is larger. Toyota Highlander is 28 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 11 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Highlander is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 453 litres | 135 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 135 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 453 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2387 litres | 1877 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space (by 97 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Highlander (by 510 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Highlander is 0.2 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`703 kg | 2`170 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`964 kg | 1`655 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 739 kg | 515 kg | |
| Toyota Highlander load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 30 procentiem more than Nissan X-Trail. Therefore, Toyota Highlander is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 47 400 | 24 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Highlander has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |