Toyota Highlander 2019 vs Volvo XC90 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 186 HP | 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 237 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
| Toyota Highlander engine produces 63 HP less power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 113 NM less than Volvo XC90. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 10.5 | |
|
The Toyota Highlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Highlander consumes 3.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that by driving the Toyota Highlander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 570 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 71 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| Toyota Highlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo XC90 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Volvo S60, Volvo XC60, Volvo V60, Volvo S90 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo XC90 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.97 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.78 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota Highlander is 1 cm longer than the Volvo XC90, width is practically the same , while the height of Toyota Highlander is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 453 litres | 368 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2387 litres | no data | |
|
Toyota Highlander has more luggage capacity. Toyota Highlander has 85 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC90. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Highlander is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Toyota Highlander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`722 | 2`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 36 800 | 44 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Highlander has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |